<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.8.5 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:46:06 GMT--><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/universal/styles/feed.css"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Blog: Financial Reporting Using XBRL - Comments</title><link>http://xbrl.squarespace.com/journal/</link><description></description><copyright></copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.8.5 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>Geoff Shuetrim comments on Top 10 Errors to Avoid in Creating Your SEC XBRL Filings</title><author>Geoff Shuetrim</author><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:21:55 +0000</pubDate><link>http://xbrl.squarespace.com/journal/2009/11/26/top-10-errors-to-avoid-in-creating-your-sec-xbrl-filings.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">24118:165869:comment/6465036</guid><description><![CDATA[It is interesting how helpful the information about frequency of concept usage is in driving mappings of taxonomies to underlying data sources.  The stats you present are only the tip of the iceberg here.<br/><br/>Hopefully mapping tools will quickly start doing their own statistical analysis (perhaps even by industry) of existing filings for both concept and dimension usage, when deciding how to guide users through the maze that is XBRL taxonomies today.]]></description></item><item><title>VahthaltZence comments on "The SEC, they totally get it."</title><author>VahthaltZence</author><pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:23:08 +0000</pubDate><link>http://xbrl.squarespace.com/journal/2008/4/5/the-sec-they-totally-get-it.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">24118:165869:comment/6437164</guid><description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=<a rel="nofollow" href="http://lapointjhk.blogspot.com&gt;free">http://lapointjhk.blogspot.com&gt;free</a> sample aficans vedios&lt;/a&gt;<br/>[URL=<a rel="nofollow" href="http://bartschftgh.blogspot.com">http://bartschftgh.blogspot.com</a> - free hardcore xxx male orgasm[/URL - <br/><a rel="nofollow" href="http://margaretghg.blogspot.com">http://margaretghg.blogspot.com</a>]]></description></item><item><title>NW comments on Occurance of Fact Values in SEC Filings</title><author>NW</author><pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 18:29:33 +0000</pubDate><link>http://xbrl.squarespace.com/journal/2009/11/17/occurance-of-fact-values-in-sec-filings.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">24118:165869:comment/6431666</guid><description><![CDATA[To address the fiscal period issue should there be a fiscal concept be reported in the instance or perhaps be a dimension of the context.<br/><br/>Is there a concept with USGAAP that indicates what teh fiscal year is for a particular entity?]]></description></item><item><title>Nick Topazio comments on Issue Relating to: Effect of Exchange Rate on Cash and Cash Equivalents</title><author>Nick Topazio</author><pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:44:48 +0000</pubDate><link>http://xbrl.squarespace.com/journal/2009/11/24/issue-relating-to-effect-of-exchange-rate-on-cash-and-cash-e.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">24118:165869:comment/6421925</guid><description><![CDATA[I hope that this is not an example of the tail wagging the dog.  XBRL is a reporting tool and should not constrain valid reporting techniques.  It is the role of standard-setters, preparers, auditors and the capital markets to set, follow, check and influence company's financial reporting practices.<br/><br/>Whether the presentation adopted by the 8 is optimal or not is open to question but the answer should not be derived from the ease of preparation of the XBRL reports.<br/><br/>To be fair, I do not think that this is where your post is heading but there may be some that think this way.  However, I do believe that XBRL does have an important role to play flagging up these inconsistent reporting practices which as a result of XBRL will be more easily spotted.<br/><br/>Nick Topazio<br/>Chartered Institue of Management Accountants<br/>See my blog at <a rel="nofollow" href="http://community.cimaglobal.com/node/21380">http://community.cimaglobal.com/node/21380</a>]]></description></item><item><title>Scott comments on A Thought Experiment: Understanding XBRL Instances</title><author>Scott</author><pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:14:23 +0000</pubDate><link>http://xbrl.squarespace.com/journal/2009/11/4/a-thought-experiment-understanding-xbrl-instances.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">24118:165869:comment/6301911</guid><description><![CDATA[Very useful post and enumeration of several real-life issues that need to be tackled. We've had to address several of these (entity, period and unit conflicts, standard metadata and interface) given data collection across more than 100 countries, although we haven't always done so through XBRL (or IFRS). Hopefully it will be easier to find XBRL solutions for these as adoption increases and others encounter the same issues.]]></description></item><item><title>Conciant comments on "The SEC, they totally get it."</title><author>Conciant</author><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:34:55 +0000</pubDate><link>http://xbrl.squarespace.com/journal/2008/4/5/the-sec-they-totally-get-it.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">24118:165869:comment/5988785</guid><description><![CDATA[I like your post, it's a really good stuff, keep it up! Office Conceirge has another benefit that it is economic too]]></description></item><item><title>Free and Clear System comments on "The SEC, they totally get it."</title><author>Free and Clear System</author><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 05:12:18 +0000</pubDate><link>http://xbrl.squarespace.com/journal/2008/4/5/the-sec-they-totally-get-it.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">24118:165869:comment/5941192</guid><description><![CDATA[Nice post. The profit gain from real estate is enormous but on other side those who really wants to buy a house gets hurt]]></description></item><item><title>Shortcuts to Internet Millions comments on The Business Rules Manifesto</title><author>Shortcuts to Internet Millions</author><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:49:59 +0000</pubDate><link>http://xbrl.squarespace.com/journal/2009/7/21/the-business-rules-manifesto.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">24118:165869:comment/5935883</guid><description><![CDATA[This blog Is very informative , I am really pleased to post my comment on this blog . It <br/>helped me with ocean of knowledge so I really believe you will do much better in the future . Good job web master .]]></description></item><item><title>Eugene W comments on Notion of Flow</title><author>Eugene W</author><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 02:30:16 +0000</pubDate><link>http://xbrl.squarespace.com/journal/2009/6/30/notion-of-flow.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">24118:165869:comment/4733994</guid><description><![CDATA[This is exactly what I did, facing the same issue last year. My convention was to use the &quot;nameless&quot; default Extended Link to assemble the report (I don't think &quot;flow&quot; is the right word - at least to me it means workflow). All other Extended Links were named. Also, it does not necessarily have to be a hierarchy of Schedule's - if you used the root Abstract concept from each Extended Link, it could work, too.]]></description></item><item><title>Kosal comments on XBRL Instance Graphic</title><author>Kosal</author><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:09:43 +0000</pubDate><link>http://xbrl.squarespace.com/journal/2009/6/22/xbrl-instance-graphic.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">24118:165869:comment/4616600</guid><description><![CDATA[In addition to context and unit, how is footnotes incorporated in instance document? (e.g., in terms of XML code)]]></description></item></channel></rss>