Baseline and Comparison of Fundamental Financial Report Logic
Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 09:45AM
Charlie in Digital Financial Reporting

I did this comparison of financial reporting schemes in another blog post. This blog post tunes and enhances that prior comparison.

At the heart of Pacioli which was created by Auditchain lies a new unifying logical perspective upon financial reports.

Here is what I mean.  Look at the graphic below (here is the document that contains the graph and more details).  Consider the following and as you do have a look at the GREEN bars on the Pacioli summary page that show that EVERY financial reporting scheme can consistently represent the same logic within their XBRL taxonomy (or SHOULD be able to).  Consider:

Here is the summary that compares FOUR major financial reporting schemes with a BASELINE that summarizes the logic of financial reports: XBRL-based digital financial reports cannot simply (a) leave required logic out or (b) violate logical rules.
 

Here is a visual representation of the mathematical interconnections:

Here is the next level of logic, the elements of financial statements of numerous financial reporting schemes.

And so, not only are financial reports knowledge graphs, there is a logical meta-model that describes financial reports generally (see Logical Theory Describing Financial Report).  It is this consistent logic that provides the patterns that are used to control processes; the basis for the Seattle Method.  This is the magic of the double entry accounting model and the accounting equation. To understand, start by reading the Essence of Accounting.  Then, dive into the Essentials of XBRL-based Digital Financial Reporting. Then check out these examples that will help you better learn XBRL-based digital financial reporting.

Article originally appeared on XBRL-based structured digital financial reporting (http://xbrl.squarespace.com/).
See website for complete article licensing information.