BLOG:  Digital Financial Reporting

This is a blog for information relating to digital financial reporting.  This blog is basically my "lab notebook" for experimenting and learning about XBRL-based digital financial reporting.  This is my brain storming platform.  This is where I think out loud (i.e. publicly) about digital financial reporting. This information is for innovators and early adopters who are ushering in a new era of accounting, reporting, auditing, and analysis in a digital environment.

Much of the information contained in this blog is synthasized, summarized, condensed, better organized and articulated in my book XBRL for Dummies and in the chapters of Intelligent XBRL-based Digital Financial Reporting. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me.

Entries from September 27, 2015 - October 3, 2015

Public Company Quality Continues to Improve, Two Generators at 90%

The improvement is slow and steady which might not be sexy, but the quality of public company XBRL-based digital financial reports continues to improve.

A second software vendor/filing agent, Merrill, joins DataTracks with over 90% of all of the XBRL-based public company digital financial reports which they create being consistent with all 22 of the basic, common sense fundamental accounting concept relations rules.

(Click image for larger view)

As can be seen in the four month comparison and comparison across individual consistency check:

  • Between June 2015 and September 2015, the total number of public company XBRL-based digital financial reports consistent with all 22 of the basic, common sense fundamental accounting concept relations went from 70.6% to 75.8%.
  • For the same period, the total number of inconsistencies with those rules dropped from 3,001 to 2,424.
  • If you consider each individual consistency check of which there are 150,040; 98.38% of all fundamental accounting concept relations are shown to be consistent with expectation.
  • The least consistent rule is 96.3% which means that at least that percentage of the total 6,820 are consistent with the rule. That means only 3.7% are inconsistent with that rule for some reason.

 Comparison across four months:

(Click image for larger view"

 Information per fundamental accounting concept consistency check:

(Click image for larger view)

I don't know if the XBRL US Data Quality Committee is considering adding these basic, common sense fundamental accounting concept relations to their battery of consistency checks.  I would encourage you to ask members of the committee why they would not add these basic common sense rules.

Posted on Thursday, October 1, 2015 at 07:14AM by Registered CommenterCharlie in | CommentsPost a Comment | EmailEmail | PrintPrint