Digital Financial Reporting

This blog post builds on the Microsoft XBRL-based Report Analysis. The Microsoft is a real report from a real company.  What I was able to do was verify virtually 100% of that Microsoft report using a method that I created.  The problem is that word "vitrually".  To prove 100% I need to be sure that I can verify 100%.  Because Microsoft had some extensions, I was only able to verify 94.8% of all disclosure mechanics rules.

But for this XASB reference implementation I can verify 100%.  Here is that verification: 

• Video walking you through the analysis (coming soon)
• XBRL instance
• XBRL taxonomy
• XBRL Cloud Evidence Package
• Pesseract Verification Results
• Fundamental Accounting Concept Relations (included with other mathematical relations)
• Disclosure Mechanics Validation Results, Pesseract
• Reporting Checklist Validation Results, Pesseract
• Disclosure Mechanics Rules (Human readable | Machine readable)
• Reporting Checklist Rules (Human readable | Machine readable)
• Model Structure Rules (Human readable | Machine readable)
• Type-subtype Rules (Human readable | Machine readable)
• Blocks